Talk:Zi Corporation
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Egil in topic Nomination for deletion
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Zi Corporation article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 26 December 2015. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Potential additional controversies edit
A case where I did not find good enough referrences:
- It has been claimed that a key patent contained under the Jiejing Licenses was questionable. Eric Chappell claimed rights to it, but a 1996 UK court decision https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/449553/o16596.pdf gave the rights to Ron Thomas and Helmut Stohr (GB Patent no. 2238414 B, https://www.ipo.gov.uk/p-ipsum/Case/PublicationNumber/GB2238414 https://patentscope.wipo.int/search/en/detail.jsf?docId=WO1990002992). It is claimed Thomas and Stohr then sold the patent to Tegic, which was then used in the 2002 court case, against Zi.
Nomination for deletion edit
A request to delete the article was withdrawn after changes were made to the article, see Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Zi_Corporation. -- Egil (talk) 08:10, 29 December 2015 (UTC)