Talk:Zero differential overlap

Chemistry Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notation for the two-electron integrals is not standard - the definition of angle bracket integrals here appear to be identical to the round bracket notation (m n | l r) which appears to be standard use today. The angle brackets could be easily confused for what Szabo and Ostlund call "physicists' notation", as compared to the "chemists' notation" used here. AcidFlask (talk) 22:31, 12 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

I completely agree with the comment above. Additionally, the integration variables are wrong. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.77.24.38 (talk) 14:05, 7 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Wrong definition edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The definition of ZDO is wrong! It is claimed that the product is assumed zero when $\mu$ and $\nu$ are not the same, but is should read $A$ and $B$ are not the same! The consequence for the integrals are also wrong! Simenkv (talk) 19:11, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic