A fact from Yusuf II of Granada appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 September 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that a Christian writer claimed to have seen Yusuf II of Granada putting on a poisoned tunic, which caused the Sultan's death within thirty days?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
This article was copy edited by Miniapolis, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 17 October 2020.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles
Latest comment: 3 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Amkgp (talk) 18:40, 5 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
... that a Christian writer claimed to have seen Yusuf II of Granada putting on a poisoned tunic, which caused the Sultan's death within thirty days? Source: Harvey, p. 221
Overall: The second "that" in the DYK might not be necessary, and could be removed to make it shorter. I'll let the promoter or nominator decide that. Z1720 (talk) 15:18, 30 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Z1720: Thank you for the review. Replaced with "claimed to have seen". Is that better? HaEr48 (talk) 00:08, 31 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
Yes it is. I approve the revised wording. Z1720 (talk) 00:09, 31 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
The second "that" in the DYK might not be necessary, and could be removed to make it shorter. I'll let the promoter or nominator decide that. Z1720 (talk) 15:18, 30 August 2020 (UTC)