Talk:Yosemite Short Line Railway

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Further reading, etc. edit

The article has only 1 ref., which is a dead link. I would have marked it as such if I knew how. But I was curious about the subject and found 2 very fine articles at pacificng.org. They are undated, but the Francis article cites a source from 2006, so is no earlier than that. I decided the best way to edit the Wikipedia entry was to make a "Further reading" section that lists them, providing links. This article remains low-importance stub class, but at least it has 2 useful links for others who may be curious. Oaklandguy (talk) 06:43, 18 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Yosemite Short Line Railway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:22, 16 July 2016 (UTC)Reply