Talk:York Vision

Newspapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal York Vision is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Website out of date edit

Anyone know why the york vision website is so out of date? It's not been updated this accademic year by the looks of things... -- Tomhab 11:56, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)

The last revert to the article on 29th July edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Much of what was removed from the article in that revert does appear to be truew if my memory serves me corrctly, however, I do think the way it was written was not suitable. Also, even some of the bits which were true probably don't need to be incldued. Can someone with a better memory than me varify that the 'Lecturer: my child porn shame' stuff and the media awards stuff is all true? I know the paper won the Guardian aweard thing for at least 3 years in a row and there was at least one lecturer arrested over child pornography which I read about in the paper. Evil Eye 17:04, 30 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Turns out you were right about the media awards stuff! Maragil (talk) 15:27, 28 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:York Vision/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

.

Requires addition of inline references using one of the {{Cite}} templates
Requires photographs
Requires copy-edit for WP:MOS
Lists need attention - turn into prose if appropriate

Keith D 15:49, 5 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 20:53, 12 May 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 11:06, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Undoing of revisions edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

As per WP:COI I note that I have undone the revisions throughout March referring to 'controversy'. Whilst factually accurate, it was very poorly written. Further, I note I am the author of the article which was referred to, and the person who did the research that the article was based off. I also believe the author themselves had a COI, as they identified themselves to me, but naturally will not identify them.

Maragil (talk) 15:26, 28 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic