Talk:Yeti Airlines Flight 101

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the Aviation accident project.

Nepal Low‑importance

	Nepal portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Flight number edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion

The official report states that the flight number was YT-101. Shouldn't the name of the article be changed to "Yeti Airlines Flight 101"?NORECH (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 09:16, 4 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

I was thinking the same. Some sources refer to it as flight 103, while the final reort and some other sources refer to it as flight 101. I guess we should go with the final report since that is the most reliable source to extract information from. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.226.181.54 (talk) 09:07, 5 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Unfortunately, the CVR transcript has been trimmed out of the final report in the appendices section. Had it not been trimmed out, it would've been easier to tell what was the flightnumber per the callsign. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.226.181.54 (talk) 09:12, 5 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Plaque has 18 names, rather than 17? edit

Latest comment: 7 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

17 fatalities and 18 names on the plaque? Eiger3970 (talk) 05:47, 1 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic