Talk:YB SK Beveren

Neutrality

I'm a bit concerned that there might be some COI going on here in the case of Robinbeck. See for instance "From the early beginnings, YB SK Beveren took AFC Wimbledon as an excellent example of a succesfull club based on fan participation." Sections of the article should maybe be rewritten for neutrality. JZCL 16:09, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

It is indeed a fact that I have a close connection to the club (I am a board member) but I'll use references for every addition to the text. AFC Wimbledon was indeed an example for our club as the early website reports and visits to the club confirm. However, feel free to add your concerns, since I'm not used to contributing to Wikipedia and do not have the intention of writing a false impression about the club. Many thanks for your aid and support! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robinbeck (talk • contribs) 12:24, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Most refs are dead

Most of the refs are news articles on Eskabee.be. This host is redirected to KSK Beveren, but the paths are no longer matching. I would suggest to remove all these refs and hope for a fan to get new citations. Rofraja (talk) 20:34, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Neutrality of major contributor/editor.

According to Wikipedia, a major contributor/editor has/had a close connection to the person in question. Can we update the issue listed or revise the wording? Somebody294625 (talk) 02:21, 8 May 2024 (UTC)