 | Xeromphalina setulipes is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
 | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on August 14, 2014. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
 | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 12, 2011. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the mushroom Xeromphalina setulipes is known only from Ciudad Real Province, Spain? | ||||||||||||
| Current status: Featured article | |||||||||||||
| This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
GA Review edit
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Xeromphalina setulipes/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Ucucha 18:29, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
Fungal GA noms tend to be taken fast, so I'm claiming this one now; I'll provide comments over the next few days. Ucucha 18:29, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
- Wah! I saw this appear on my watchlist, and figured I'd wait until after lunch to sign up for it ... that'll teach me. Sasata (talk) 18:56, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
- Ha! Ucucha 21:01, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
It's looking good; I made a few minor changes. You seem to overuse semicolons a little in the description section, though for GA that shouldn't be a problem. Also, why don't you have anything on the phylogenetic analyses the describers carried out? Ucucha 09:18, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the fixes! I didn't include much on the phylogenetic analyses because I'm not actually a scientist, I just pretend to be one on Wikipedia. I read it about five times and I just couldn't understand what was going on. I noted their conclusion (the most closely related species) but the experiment itself was too much. I'll probably revisit it at some point, maybe when I've written a few other articles with that sort of info. J Milburn (talk) 11:54, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
- I've added a little myself; for phylogenetic analyses, it's generally more useful to read the figures than the text. The results don't seem very conclusive. (And I'm also not a scientist, just a pretender.) Ucucha 21:05, 7 January 2011 (UTC)