Talk:Wu Commandery

History section

@損齋: The History section of the article is little unclear it can be rewritten and made more clear. --✝iѵɛɳ२२४०^{†ลℓк †๏ мэ} 04:07, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

@Tiven2240: History is about facts. Personally I would not add more to it if not neccesary. The Chinese names are strange to Indo-European language speakers, this I would agree. Do you consider the names unfamiliar or the history to be too brief?----損齋 (talk) 04:12, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

Assessment

@損齋:. Hello. We can discuss "Assessment" here. I checked the parameters over at WikiProject China Assessment. It seems we can upgrade to at least a class=C and importance=Mid. It was already at importance=Mid, I just wanted to double check. Depending on how much work you think is completed, we might be able to upgrade to a class=B. Please read Quality scale subsection and let me know if you think it is class=B? Meanwhile I will upgrade to a class=C and add importance=mid. Steve Quinn (talk) 01:23, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

@Steve Quinn: Hello. Thanks for the help. I will read the link and see whatelse I can do. ----損齋 (talk) 03:12, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

@Steve Quinn: Hello again Quinn. I further improved this article according to the B scale standard. I would personally deem this article eligible for a B rating. What do you think? ----損齋 (talk) 03:04, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

@損齋:. At first glance it looks satisfactory for a B rating. However, I would like to review in more detail. I am tired right now, so I will be able to come back in a day or two. Is this OK with you? ---Steve Quinn (talk) 04:32, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

@Steve Quinn: Of course ----損齋 (talk) 04:37, 25 August 2017 (UTC)