Talk:World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the World of Warcraft: Shadowlands article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find video game sources: "World of Warcraft: Shadowlands" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
.svg){kind=small} | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Award nomination edit
---Another Believer (Talk) 00:34, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Development section? edit
Every other World of Warcraft expansion article has a section focused on the expansion's development in some form. Adding one for Shadowlands will increase the quality and maintain uniformity across the expansion articles, yes? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MatchesSalv (talk • contribs) 04:25, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
The original Shadowlands edit
I removed the citation because it doesn't seem like a reliable source. It's a guy on YouTube speculating based on a series of Twitter posts by... some guy claiming to be a WoW developer and writing really far-fetched claims, providing way too much information that's impossible to verify, with lots of misspellings of names, and without any proof. - Linneris (talk) 22:41, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Patch 9.2 edit
Under player reception, it says players felt 9.2 was "reparative" and "disrespected their time." There is no citation for this and it seems to just be a personal opinion.
My recollection is that 9.2 was widely seen as moving in the right direction and was considered a good patch. Covenants were opened up and not punishing to switch between -- which was a major complaint previously. Also the use of older raids as "fated" raids, and the timewalking M+ were both pretty universally seen as great features. If you just google "wow 9.2" you will find almost entirely positive reddit threads, articles, and videos... But I'm not saying my recollection should be switched in for someone else's, I just think the opinion should be taken out, so I am removing that sentence. 2601:19C:5080:18E0:209B:22C1:88BB:74EE (talk) 21:33, 22 October 2023 (UTC)