Talk:World communism

Socialism Low‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Social and political / Contemporary Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Social and political philosophy
	Contemporary philosophy

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

deleted edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article is already referenced in the article communism.RYNORT 22:32, 8 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Was this written by a journalist? Or just copied from edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The tone of this page is terrible, it's definitely not appropriate as per the Manual of Style, for example:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#Instructional_and_presumptuous_language

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Words_to_watch#Editorializing

On top of the single source, which isn't even quoted accurately in the second case. Bertcocaine (talk) 23:39, 12 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

What's the point of this article? edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article, with very few sources, doesn't seem to have a topic separate from the communism article. What's it for? BobFromBrockley (talk) 09:37, 22 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

FYI Marxists.org is a big potential resource for cites edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

But finding specific relevant cites for bits of the article will take time. Maybe I will try to do that later but I’m not well read on communism and the like 2601:282:847F:1F0:4864:E78D:9829:A51E (talk) 08:18, 22 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Serious POV issues edit

Latest comment: 4 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Almost the entire article is unsourced and hilariously opinionated. Heavily disputed interpretations of history among scholars are presented as fact. It reads like a manifesto. PrecariousWorlds (talk) 18:14, 5 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

@PrecariousWorlds I am a leftist and even I recognize this. I think an article on this topic would be helpful, but it is evident that this article as it is currently written is not up to Wikipedia's standards 98.116.173.242 (talk) 01:57, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. I'd say this article should probably be merged into Communism PrecariousWorlds (talk) 07:09, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic