 | This article was nominated for deletion on 6 January 2024. The result of the discussion was merge. |
February 2020 edit
> Some of this article's listed sources may not be reliable. > This article may rely excessively on sources too closely associated with the subject
The references that this would most likely fall under are only used for feature listings, initial release date, and the latest release version and date. These should be fine, potentially best, as first-party links, no?
> The topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia's notability guideline for web content.
Based on the below criteria it appears to meet it, however further citations can be applied if necessary.
> The content itself has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself. This criterion includes reliable published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, magazine articles, books, television documentaries, websites, and published reports by consumer watchdog organizations[4] except for media re-prints of press releases and advertising for the content or site[5] or trivial coverage, such as: a brief summary of the nature of the content or the publication of Internet addresses and site, newspaper articles that simply report the times at which such content is updated or made available, and content descriptions in directories or online stores.
> This article provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject
Roger that, will fix — Preceding unsigned comment added by Craigd99 (talk • contribs) 08:56, February 1, 2020 (UTC)