Talk:Wooloo

There’s really no use for this article

I really don’t know why this page really exists. I mean, what’s the purpose…? Sure, it was fan-influential, but I whymake a Wikipedia article for this pokemon in particular? What are you planning to do, make articles for ‘em all? I don’t know…I think this is useless as long as Bulbapedia exists.. Inaturlist Lover (talk) 12:18, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Wololo! Panini! • 🥪 22:44, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:Wooloo/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Brachy0008 (talk · contribs) 09:23, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Review

Hello! I will be reviewing the article. I am honoured to do so, as I’m kind of a Pokémon fan myself (guess my favourite Pokémon if you want to, but I can confirm it is not Wooloo). So far, the significant problem is the MoS violations.

Prose

• A mention of Shigeru Ohmori’s reaction to the critical reception of the Pokémon is not present in the prose, despite being in the lead.
  • It should be there, first paragraph of reception, by his last name.
    • Done!

Sources/Citations

• (Optional) Try adding secondary sources, but I’ll leave them be if such sources are not available. I helped you with one of them.
• The only concern, the overuse of FN 7 (primary source). It’s used four times on this page.
  • Should be fixed now. Fixed an oversight with a few missing accessdate.
    • Done.

Copy-vios

• Nothing special from Earwig, but I’ll let that 26.5% be.

Images

• So far, so good!
• (Optional) If you can, try adding more Wooloo pics.
  • I fear given the size of the article adding more than one might get called out for fair use rationale if I add another.
    • That’s why it’s optional

@Brachy0008: Everything should be addressed!--Kung Fu Man (talk) 10:06, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Very well then, I will pass it. Brachy08 _(Talk) 10:10, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.