 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Picture edit
The picture of the CZ 75B is not appropriate because it isn't appropriate for this article, because the model chosen is chambered in .40 S&W (which is specifically a 10mm round, not a 9mm round - the namesake of the "wonder nine" expression). The source claims claims that the CZ 75 is an appropriate example because the wiki article literally lists it as a classic example of a Wonder Nine, but that article is specifically referring to the CZ 75 and not the CZ 75 B. The picture should be changed to a Glock 17, a Beretta 92 or a Sig Sauer P220 series, as these are by far the most iconic examples of the Wonder Nines. If the editors of this page insist on using a picture of a CZ 75-series, at least use the picture of the original, and not the 75-B. Samitscherning (talk) 19:43, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
MAB PA-15 edit
PA15 is not double action — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.159.32.21 (talk) 13:28, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Sources edit
- "The CZ-75, One Solid Wonder Nine". Firearms First Gun Talk. 29 April 2006. Retrieved 2 June 2014.[dead link]
- Replacement link: [1]
- Buffaloe, Ed; Bill Kelsey. "The M.A.B. PA-15 Pistol". Unblinking Eye. Retrieved 2 June 2014.[self-published source?]
These sources do not appear to meet Wikipedia standards because they look like self published sources whose author has not had work published in the field by reputable third parties (WP:SPS). These citations and the material they reference may be removed, per WP:V. If you have any information showing that the source is in fact suitable for Wikipedia, please add it here. If you can find a replacement source, please add it to the article. Rezin (talk) 16:14, 13 November 2014 (UTC)