Talk:Women's Auxiliary Army Corps (New Zealand)

Latest comment: 3 years ago by SL93 in topic Did you know nomination

Missing word edit

“following the introduction of they were subject ...” – there’s a word missing between “of” and “they”. Schwede66 15:52, 31 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Schwede66, actually, there were a few words missing! I have revised this section to correct this omission. Thanks for spotting the error and for your other changes. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 21:19, 31 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Did you know nomination edit

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 22:19, 6 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Created by Zawed (talk). Nominated by The Bushranger (talk) at 08:45, 31 January 2021 (UTC).Reply

  •   The article is new; length is okay; citations are okay; the content is neutral; 28.6% similarity, mostly due to long titles; qpq verified; but there is a problem with the hook - the content mentioning the hook is These volunteers, the first New Zealand women to serve overseas in aid of the war effort, were known as Tuis. The tui, a native bird of New Zealand, became the emblem of the WAAC. - the volunteer came to be known as Tuis, but Tui (bird) itself didn't serve in the corps, which makes the hook misleading. Please let me know if I am missing something, otherwise, the hook needs to replaced. KCVelaga (talk) 08:00, 1 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
  GTG with ALT1. KCVelaga (talk) 08:15, 1 February 2021 (UTC)Reply