Talk:Wishbone (computer bus)

Latest comment: 8 years ago by 140.105.17.191

Rather than saying that a WB is a "hardware computer bus" I would say that it is a "bus interface" since the standard doesn't prescribe any bus, i.e. the same given WB interface can be connected to many different kind of buses. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.105.17.191 (talk) 08:18, 21 August 2015 (UTC)Reply


Don't mean to be too picky, but the graphics on this page are kind of crude, and would probably best not be in JPEG format... AnonMoos (talk) 17:44, 8 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

It seems to me, most of the graphics is printsreened from the Wishbone specification PDF. --Volodymyr Obrizan (talk) 07:46, 8 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Comparison to the Avalon Bus edit

It is slightly weird that the description of Wishbone is based on a comparison with the Altera Avalon bus (interconnect fabric), especially since Wikipedia doesn't contain an entry about Avalon. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.110.39.122 (talk) 15:04, 18 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

impossibility of this mapping between Wishbone and Avalon edit

I don't know what is Avalon. But because of formulas written on this article, only cyc and we can not be used to recombine to write_n and read_n. Given two compound propositions composed of proposition variables p and q and different from p and q, if you want to get p and q back from only that two compound propositions, then that two compound propositions must be that one is "p xor q" or "p ↔ q" and another one is p, q, ~p or ~q.

Sorry for my poor English.--LungZeno (talk) 05:06, 4 July 2012 (UTC)Reply