Talk:Winter Garden Theatre/GA1
GA Review edit
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Simongraham (talk · contribs) 13:30, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
This looks like yet another well-researched article on New York theatres by Epicgenius and is likely to be close to Good Article status already. I will start my review soon. simongraham (talk) 13:30, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Comments edit
This is a stable and well-written article. 96.0% of authorship is by Epicgenius. It is currently ranked B class and a DYK nominee.
- The article is of appropriate length, 4,913 words of readable prose, plus a referenced list of notable productions and an infobox.
- It is written in a summary style, consistent with relevant Manuals of Style.
- Citations seem to be thorough.
- Is BroadwayWorld.com a reliable sources?
- Not sure. I removed it just in case. Epicgenius (talk) 13:40, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you. simongraham (talk) 08:26, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- Not sure. I removed it just in case. Epicgenius (talk) 13:40, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
- Other references appear to be from reputable sources.
- Our theatres to-day and yesterday (1913) (14579807750).jpg needs appropriate licensing tags added.
- Done. Epicgenius (talk) 13:40, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
- Other images have appropriate licensing and public domain or CC tags.
- Earwig's Copyvio Detector identifies a 9.1% chance of copyright violation.
- The article on Adam Style states that it should be called "Style of the Brothers Adam".
- The sources cited in this article refer to it as the "Adam style" or as "Adamesque". Incidentally, the Adam style article says that "Adamesque" is a valid alternate name along with "style of the Brothers Adam"; all three are OK. Epicgenius (talk) 13:40, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you. As it is consistent internally and with the sources, it conforms to MOS:ARTCON. simongraham (talk) 08:26, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- The sources cited in this article refer to it as the "Adam style" or as "Adamesque". Incidentally, the Adam style article says that "Adamesque" is a valid alternate name along with "style of the Brothers Adam"; all three are OK. Epicgenius (talk) 13:40, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
- "The Winter Garden Theatre's building dates to its construction in 1896 as the rebuilt American Horse Exchange" seems to be a summary of the previous section.
- I reworded it a little, but this basically was included for a smooth transition between the articles. Epicgenius (talk) 13:40, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
- I see no other obvious spelling or grammar errors.
@Epicgenius: Another well-constructed piece of work. Please ping me when you would like me to take another look. simongraham (talk) 02:12, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
- @simongraham, sorry, I realized I didn't ping you. I have responded to your comments. – Epicgenius (talk) 01:20, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Epicgenius: Great work. I will complete the review now. simongraham (talk) 08:26, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
Assessment edit
The six good article criteria:
- It is reasonable well written.
- the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct;
- it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead, layout and word choice.
- the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct;
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- it contains a reference section, presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
- all inline citations are from reliable sources;
- it contains no original research;
- it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism;
- it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail.
- it contains a reference section, presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
- It is broad in its coverage
- it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
- it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
- it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
- It has a neutral point of view.
- it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to different points of view.
- it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to different points of view.
- It is stable.
- it does not change significantly from day to day because of any ongoing edit war or content dispute.
- it does not change significantly from day to day because of any ongoing edit war or content dispute.
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- images are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content;
- images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
- images are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content;
Congratulations, Epicgenius. This article meets the criteria to be a Good Article.
Pass simongraham (talk) 08:33, 11 December 2021 (UTC)