Talk:Windsor station (Connecticut)

Connecticut Mid‑importance

	Connecticut portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: Stations Stub‑class Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Stub

This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Also the Hartford & New Haven Railroad Depot edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

This station is also listed separately as the historic Hartford & New Haven Railroad Depot as you can see at this link. I say it's time we go for another merger. ----DanTD (talk) 02:02, 17 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

The merger must obviously be done, I'm just not sure which article to merge with the other. I personally don't think putting the content of Windsor, Connecticut (Amtrak station) into Hartford & New Haven Railroad Depot is a smart idea as I'm sure nobody knows the station by that name. Murjax (talk) 14:16, 17 June 2008 (UTC)Reply
- Evidently, the creator of Hartford & New Haven Railroad Depot is one of the people who does. But like you, I'm leaning toward merging H&NH Depot into Windsor, Connecticut (Amtrak station). There is, however the issue of Windsor-Mt. Ascutney (Amtrak station), which was once known as Windsor, Vermont (Amtrak station). Like that one in Vermont, I wouldn't mind working the old H&NH name into the current Windsor, CT one as a means of moving away from state distinctions. ----DanTD (talk) 14:28, 17 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

UPDATE: I just received a message from the creator, and she agrees with the merger. ----DanTD (talk) 15:36, 17 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

I like it. :) edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

However, it's listed on the NRHP as the Hartford & New Haven Railroad Depot. Can we state that title somewhere in the article as well? Chrissypan (talk) 18:08, 17 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

It looks like it was already mentioned to me. ----DanTD (talk) 18:33, 17 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 31 January 2016 edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago6 comments6 people in discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) sst✈^(conjugate) 06:53, 8 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

It was proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved.

The discussion has been closed, and the result will be found in the closer's comment.

Links: current log • target log

– Per WP:USSTATION. Double move request for our "Windsor" stations in Connecticut. "Windsor" is ambiguous with everything, but can be disambiguated by state. Windsor, Connecticut and Windsor Locks, Connecticut are sufficiently distinct that they are not ambiguous with each other. Given state disambiguation a hatnote for Windsor-Mt. Ascutney station probably isn't necessary. Mackensen (talk) 17:45, 31 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Support. FFM784 (talk) 18:00, 31 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Support per nom. --Regards, James(^talk/_contribs) 16:48, 1 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
Support. Fits the WP:USSTATION guideline and common use.--Cúchullain ^t/c 20:13, 2 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
Comment though the locks themselves have a lock station, so the "station" would be a nautical station controlling the canal locks, so the article should have a hatnote indicating the nautical locks -- 70.51.200.135 (talk) 17:02, 6 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Add topic