Talk:Wilman

Australia: Western Australia / Noongar / Indigenous peoples Low‑importance

	Australia portal Wilman is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject Noongar (assessed as Low-importance).
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject Indigenous peoples of Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Western Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Languages Low‑importance

	Language portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This is already covered at edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Wiilman, and this has nothing to merge in that article, since it is unsourced, and virtusally without content. I suggest someone delete this.Nishidani (talk) 12:38, 23 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

I notice that there's a couple of bits in Wilman that are not yet mentioned in Wiilman:

"...Noongar dialectical group..." — Wiilman is in Category:Noongar but doesn't mention the term anywhere in the body text, but it should, per WP:CATV.
"...south east of Perth..." — probably appropriate for the lead sentence in Wiilman.

If you add the relevant text to Wiilman, I'll propose deletion of Wilman (or you could just do it yourself). That's probably simpler than the merge process. Mitch Ames (talk) 12:56, 23 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic