Talk:William Saunders (botanist)

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about a botanist or someone who contributed to the field of botany

Peacock Terms in the article edit

Latest comment: 9 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

@Glendoremus I saw your edit and need to tell you that per WP:WNTRMT: You should not remove maintenance templates if any of the following apply: You do not understand the issues raised by the template. So I'm going to restore the tag after this edit. Here's what I find needs to be changed (emphasis on the problematic words):
1. Saunders' most important contributions dealt with the propagation of fruit trees and grape vines.
2. authored hundreds of articles on horticulture and introduced numerous plant species into the United States
On a different note: The William_Saunders_(botanist)#Grange section is still unsourced please add a source or remove the section.
Again, please read WP:WTRMT to see when to remove the template and when not. Nobody (talk) 05:41, 6 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for sharing your concerns. I changed the phrase "most important contributions" but felt like "numerous" was a perfectly reasonable way to characterize the large number of plant species he introduced. This characterization is supported in the text with details and appropriate citations. I'll leave it to another editor to review and decide when to remove the template. Glendoremus (talk) 02:49, 8 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic