This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indiana Historical Society, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indiana Historical Society-related articles and topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indiana Historical SocietyWikipedia:GLAM/Indiana Historical SocietyTemplate:WikiProject Indiana Historical SocietyIndiana Historical Society articles
Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Conner was born somewhere in today's Tuscarawas County, Ohio. Some sources suggest 'Schoenbrunn', other 'Lichtenau'. --Camptown 22:20, 22 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Clarified the discrepancy in article content; sources don't agree on his birthplace. Rosalina523 (talk) 17:55, 29 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
A rather minor inconsistency, but it says in this article Connor was the man to have identified the body of Tecumseh after his death (and it's just appeared on the DYK panel stating that), while in the Tecumseh article, it says his body was never found. Which is correct? Neither article seems to have a particular reference to the matter. RonaldDonald33 23:04, 23 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Following the Battle of the Thames, Conner was among those who identified the body, but the discrepancy is whether the identified body, which had been severely mutiliated, was actually Tecumseh's. Some do not believe that is was and have challenged the assertion. The Tecumseh article provides details. Rosalina523 (talk) 18:00, 29 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
