Talk:Why Has Bodhi-Dharma Left for the East?

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Korean cinema task force.

Korea Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Korean cinema task force.

Buddhism Low‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spelling edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I believe 달마가 should be transliterated as "Darmaga" (or "Dharmaga") rather than "Dalmaga"), and 까닭은 should be transliterated as "kkadalk-eun" rather than "kkadakeun" (not leaving out the "l" in the second syllabic block). Badagnani (talk) 00:49, 28 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hard to say, since it's from a Sanskrit word, and Korean Romanization is pretty changeable anyway... I think I copied it from IMDB, and they're far from authoritative in Korean. Feel free to change as appropriate, Badagnani. Dekkappai (talk) 00:52, 28 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, I think it would be best to have a Korean second opinion. Appletrees or Visviva should be good to check it. Badagnani (talk) 01:00, 28 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Add topic