A fact from White Coke appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 October 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
While I have no first-hand knowledge or experience with White Coke, I believe the current maintenance tag indicating that the article might be a hoax is a fine example of WP:DISRUPTive editing because each claim in the article is referenced to reliable sources. Granted, sources themselves might be a part of an elaborate hoax, but that seems quite unlikely as it would have to involve four different authors, editorial boards of two newspapers (including The New York Times), and editorial oversight by BBC News and Cambridge University Press.--Tomobe03 (talk) 11:32, 24 July 2013 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
