This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Roots music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to roots, folk and traditional folk music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Roots musicWikipedia:WikiProject Roots musicTemplate:WikiProject Roots musicRoots music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Appalachia, a collaborative effort to increase coverage of Appalachia and the Appalachian Mountains. If you would like to participate, go to the project page to see a list of related articles needing attention.AppalachiaWikipedia:WikiProject AppalachiaTemplate:WikiProject AppalachiaAppalachia articles
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
References I can find seem to agree on 1931, so I changed it to that, unless someone can find better documentation. Pustelnik (talk) 19:31, 19 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
By the way, if "J.H. Blair" has a Wikipedia page, we should link to it... AnonMoos (talk) 06:55, 27 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
He was the local sheriff, at the beck and call of the mine operators, and had attacked Florence and her family; the only reason he's remembered is because of his mention in this song. --Orange Mike | Talk 15:11, 27 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
Oh -- I thought he might be a corporate bigwig... AnonMoos (talk) 02:07, 28 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Does anyone know the copyright status of this song? Presumably it's still copyrighted, but a number of sites list it as a "traditional" so I was wondering. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.180.155.189 (talk) 15:45, 4 January 2012 (UTC)Reply