Talk:Wheelock (brand)

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Ironmatic1 in topic Improvement
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cooper Wheelock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:03, 12 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

DC mechanical horns on FWR current vs filtered DC

edit

Should there be any mention about the tone quality of the DC mechanical horns on FWR current compared to filtered DC? The tone quality on FWR has been described as sounding "raspy", and as having a "much cleaner" tone on filtered DC. It already mentions the 7001 and 7002 models with the horn and strobe wired in series (when the strobe flashes, it draws power, causing the horn to "skip") and so I don't see why the tone quality of the DC mechanical horns on FWR vs filtered DC shouldn't be included in the article.--2601:153:800:8308:3813:9EF8:FA5A:C703 (talk) 21:48, 5 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Improvement

edit

Much of the article is organized completely illogically, lacks citations, and has had silly statements such as "Cooper Wheelock products are often loud to alert occupants." and "The Wheelock AS has a reputation for how loud it is on high volume.", which I've since removed.

Mircom is an independent company. The claim that Mircom is wholly owned by Wheelock is just factually wrong. That section could be improved by writing about how Mircom and Honeywell design their systems to be compatible with Wheelock notification, and how Siemens uses Wheelock products branded and modeled under their own name, owing to the lawsuit over synchronization that in settlement retired Siemens to discontinue their own notification and use Wheelock products with their systems, and even though the condition has expired, they still do. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ironmatic1 (talkcontribs) 06:51, 27 December 2019 (UTC)Reply