Talk:What More Can I Give/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): The Grammar and spelling are correct, and the prose is clear.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): Not enough references in "Recording"

There are no more sources available. Everything in that section is sourced. Pyrrhus16 01:45, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

b (citations to reliable sources):

2. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): it addresses the main aspects of the topic b (focused):

3. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias: Review: this article is being reviewed (additional comments are welcome).

4. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

5. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

6. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

• Add link to Spanish language and italicize it

• Done.

• Change link form "anti-[[South Africa under apartheid|apartheid]]" to "[[South Africa under apartheid|anti-apartheid]]"

• Done.

• In "Background and writing," put quote box in for quote at the bottom of the section<blockquote class="toccolours" style="text-align:left; width:30%; float:left; margin:0 20px 10px 0; display:table;">'''insert text here'''</blockquote>

• The quote is already a blockquote. The above formatting moves the quote to the left side, making the last sentence in the paragraph useless.

• Do same thing as listed above to "Airplay's" quote.

• This is in a quotebox and the blockquote formatting doesn't allow for quote attribution to the person that has made the remark.

• On the "Artists Involved" table, take off question marks

• Done.

• Resolution of cover art images should be lowered if possible, they're a bit big.

• Done CrowzRSA ^{21:10, 27 January 2010 (UTC)}

Reviewer: CrowzRSA ^{22:52, 22 January 2010 (UTC)}

Thank you for your comments thus far. :) Pyrrhus16 00:08, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

---

This GAN has passed, and this is now a good article! If you found this review helpful, please consider helping out a fellow editor by reviewing another good article nomination. Help and advice on how to do so is available here, and you can ask for the help of a GAN mentor, if you wish.

Congratulations, CrowzRSA ^{21:16, 27 January 2010 (UTC)}