Talk:Weronika Rosati/GA1

Latest comment: 3 years ago by ArturSik in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 22:10, 17 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 22:10, 17 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Infobox and lead

edit
  Done
  • Add a comma after "Last Vegas (2013)".
  Done
  • "Aside acting" → "Aside from acting"
  Done

Life and career

edit

Early life and education

edit
  • Remove the comma after "Warsaw Ochota Theatre".
  Done
  • "trained dancing" → "trained in dancing"
  Done
  • "taka" → "take"
  Done
  • Add a comma after "Larry Moss Studio".
  Done

Acting career

edit
  • Add a comma after "panned by critics".
  Done
  • "Polish actors successful" → "successful Polish actors"
  Done
  • The phrase "international scene" doesn't sound right, so try rewording.
  Done
  • "guest starred" → "guest-starred"
  Done
  • "and the 1940s" → "and 1940s"
  Done

Personal life and non-acting work

edit
  • "to leg injury" → "to a leg injury"
  Done
  • Remove the comma after "unable to walk".
  Done
  • "and a continual" → "and continual"
  Done
  • "in relationship" → "in a relationship"
  Done
  • "list of 100" → "list of the 100"
  Done
  • "of Polish" → "of the Polish"
  Done
  • "guest hosted" → "guest-hosted"
  Done

Filmography

edit
  • This section looks good.

References

edit
  • For the cite bundle after "respectively", add bullet points before each source.
  Done
  • Sources are already archived.  
  • Websites are also linked.  

@Some Dude From North Carolina: All done. Thanks so much for your review. ArturSik (talk) 19:39, 18 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Progress

edit
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·