Talk:We've Come for You All/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: WikiRedactor (talk · contribs) 16:45, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Happy to offer some thoughts! WikiRedactor (talk) 16:45, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

• A couple external links that need to be corrected. Done
• I'd like to see flat lists and start date templates applied to the infobox. Done

More to come... WikiRedactor (talk) 16:48, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

• Instead of the current headings of:

1. Background and recording
2. Release
3. Reception
4. Music
5. Track listing
6. Personnel
7. References

I recommend rearranging it to follow the format:

1. Background and recording
2. Composition (renamed from Music)
3. Critical reception
4. Release and commercial performance (renamed from Release)
5. Track listing
6. Credits and personnel (renamed from Personnel)
7. Charts (new section/table)
8. Release history (new section/table)
9. References

• Since there are only three musicians in the Guest Musician(s) column of the track listing, can you add those as notes (ie. "featuring XYZ") so that column can be removed? Or are featured artists listed differently in metal music than pop albums?

The article looks pretty solid to me, I can't find any major issues. After these comments have been addressed, I'll take another look at the article, but I shouldn't have a problem passing this. WikiRedactor (talk) 17:20, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Did all the requests. And really thanks for the review, you saved me from waiting another two months for a reviewer.--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 18:03, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

My pleasure! Good work with the article! WikiRedactor (talk) 18:10, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.