Talk:Waterhouses, County Durham

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

North East England

	North East England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject North East England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of North East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.North East EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject North East EnglandTemplate:WikiProject North East EnglandNorth East England articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Merger Discussion edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago7 comments7 people in discussion

Request received to merge articles: Waterhouses (County Durham) railway station into Waterhouses, County Durham; re-dated [December 2015]; discuss here. GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 22:37, 17 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Rationale: none given. -Pkeets (talk) 18:48, 30 October 2015 (UTC)Reply
Oppose partly because no rationale was provided, mostly because we simply don't do it. Railway stations often share their names with places, but they don't share articles. --Redrose64 (talk) 23:06, 17 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
Oppose because one is a station and one is a village. No rational means no reason to merge! Irrational? Secondarywaltz (talk) 00:03, 18 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
Oppose per RR64 & Secondarywaltz --Tagishsimon (talk) 02:24, 18 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
Oppose - The village article should mention the station, but it should not subsume it. -mattbuck (Talk) 07:53, 18 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
Oppose per all above. Stations are notable enough to sustain stand-alone articles. Mjroots (talk) 21:18, 18 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Waterhouses, County Durham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071008152556/http://archive.thisisthenortheast.co.uk/2004/02/03/62893.html to http://archive.thisisthenortheast.co.uk/2004/02/03/62893.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:13, 2 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic