Talk:Wang Shixian

Learn more about this page

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

China High‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Badminton High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Badminton, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Badminton on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BadmintonWikipedia:WikiProject BadmintonTemplate:WikiProject Badmintonbadminton articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Merger proposal edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago5 comments4 people in discussion

CLOSED

Agreed to merging of article(s) as per wp:consensus. Non-Administrative closure. GenQuest ^{"Talk to Me"} 15:32, 10 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Formal request has been received to merge: Wang Shixian career statistics into Wang Shixian; dated: March 26, 2020. Proposer's rationale: I request you to merge above mentioned pages as the main Page Wang Shixian has not enough content in it. Moreover, it will only help the readers as they will have no need to go in other page. This splitting up of page is unnecessary and not user-friendly. Pinging proposer @Zoglophie: discuss below. Richard3120 (talk) 19:09, 26 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Note: arguably Wang Shixian career statistics should not exist anyway, per WP:NOTSTATS. Richard3120 (talk) 19:13, 26 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Clearly, when you will see the Articles of Wang Yihan, Wang Shixian and one more Li Xuerui, that is clearly visible they are falling short in content, i would've appreciated the Splitting up of Articles between main and Career Statistics, but apparently they don't have much content in them. If they are merged, it will only make Article looking more good than before. Zoglophie (talk) 19:17, 26 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Merge - merging seems logical. The main article doesn't have enough content to justify the split. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:05, 27 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic