Talk:Wallum sedge frog

Australia: Queensland / Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Wallum sedge frog is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Amphibians and Reptiles Low‑importance

	Wallum sedge frog is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	It is requested that an image or images be included in this article to improve its quality.

Merge edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

It seems evident that Olongburra Frog and Wallum Sedge Frog be merged as they are the same species. Maias 06:01, 23 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

It is indeed the same species. This is the problem with refering to species by their common name. People can get confused as to if they are the same species or 2 seperate species. It should be merged, and the scientific name used as the heading. The common names and be discussed in the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Clay Simpkins (talk • contribs) 01:56, 7 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Add topic