Untitled edit

Promotional piece. Vote for removal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.35.159.138 (talk) 17:17, 26 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

second ^^ that. Clocke (talk) 22:30, 5 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Skepticism edit

I believe that this section should be deleted. I deleted the end of the last sentence because it was a blatant and misleading attempt to defame Lakiani (the subject). And while there may well be skepticism about him, I don't see how the Panama papers should be included in this section or, since both cited sources are dead links, included at all. Before deleting, I am awaiting some feedback... thoughts?142.166.81.30 (talk) 15:08, 24 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. Community Tech bot (talk) 09:21, 19 June 2018 (UTC)Reply