Talk:Virginia Society for Human Life

Virginia Society for Human Life

Removed PROD from this article. I'm not at all sure that it's a valid article, but it's very obviously not an uncontroversial deletion, so you will need to take it to AfD. Tigerboy1966  19:58, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Why is The Oldest Right to Life Organization Not Historically Significant

This article is significant due to it being the oldest right to life article. It was redirected in July 2013 by an editor and then restored in September and then promptly nominated for deletion by the same editor who deleted all the material and redirected the article in July. More comments needed here.

Please remember history should not be subject to agendas. This harms the credibility of Wikipedia.

VSHL could be contacted to have more info added about why they are historic in the Right to Life Movement.

Added many sourced activities by credible non primary sources. That shows notability. Cheers!!! 208.54.40.177 (talk) 11:24, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

This article is a hot mess

I needed to link another article to this one, so I figured I'd check it out and see if it was doing. (if you're wondering, it was Seton School (Manassas, Virginia) because I was referencing the oratory contest the VHSL holds every year and wanted to link to this page). After quickly glancing through it, I realized that this article from an organizational perspective (as in organizing by Wiki editors, not the VHSL's) is a hot mess. It briefly mentions at the top that the VHSL is anti-abortion, then jumps into an "activities" section, which feels to me like it's stolen from a bullet list on their website, then their mission statement, then other stuff. The information itself looks fine (though it needs citations), but it looks like this article has been canibalized by edit wars with unknown IP's and who knows what else. This is a shame since the subject itself is note worthy as the first anti-abortion group in America. I'll try and help out with this article, but right now it's not at the top of my priority list. Anybody else jumping in and helping would be great! Luthien22 (talk) 19:56, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Virginia Society for Human Life. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100404035622/http://www.vshlpac.org:80/endorsements-for-house-of-delegates.html to http://www.vshlpac.org/endorsements-for-house-of-delegates.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090105191840/http://www.jamesmadisoncenter.org/pressreleases/VSHL%20decision.pdf to http://www.jamesmadisoncenter.org/pressreleases/VSHL%20decision.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:58, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Looks like their PAC isn't doing too well

Account temporarily suspended. St. claires fire (talk) 18:12, 13 April 2017 (UTC)