Talk:Vine (service)/Archives/2018
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
New Section ideas
This wiki article needs a section with famous viners. What do you guys think? I vote yes it needs this section with a list of some of or all of the famous viners. It also needs the amazon video service that Amazon made that is there version of Vine on the See Also part with a link to the wiki article for that.-Written by Greshthegreat at 5:37 PM Mountain Time Zone on 7-24-14 in The USA in North America — Preceding unsigned comment added by Greshthegreat (talk • contribs) 23:31, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
- Yep i agree!
- Yoloanonymous298 (talk) 19:05, 20 April 2015 (UTC) yoloanonymous
- Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate list. Any such additions should be done judiciously and with an emphasis on the notability of each subject. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:02, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
- This sounds like a great idea. @Greshthegreat:, @Yoloanonymous298: did either one of you want to start this section? If not, I'm happy to get it going. @Cyphoidbomb:, good call – did you have any ideas in mind for what qualifies "notability" in this context? FWIW, I'm new to the talk pages, so if I'm behaving in a way that's counter to common etiquette, please let me know ^ _ ^ Stussll (talk) 00:10, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Stussll: This is a fairly old discussion, so I'd be surprised if any of the editors above responded. As a general guideline in lists, subjects should probably have articles that establish their notability before we add them. Note List of current child actors from the United States, where most of the additions have blue links? This means that most of those people have articles written about them, and notability in most cases is properly established. (See our General Notability Guideline and WP:NOTABILITY) Having all those articles exist first helps to discourage vanity additions, like grandmothers adding their beloved grandchildren to lists. Same here. I am not interested in the subject of Vine, so I wouldn't be able to contribute, but I can offer general guidance as someone who has been around Wikipedia for a long time. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:48, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
- This is helpful and makes sense...thank you for taking the time to explain, @Cyphoidbomb:. And understood RE your interest [or lack thereof] in this particular topic. Stussll (talk) 05:50, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Stussll: Sure thing. If you have general questions about Wikipedia, feel free to post a query on my talk page, or use the Help Desk where you'll probably get a quicker answer. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:20, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
- Perfect – thanks, @Cyphoidbomb: ^ _ ^ Stussll (talk) 16:46, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Stussll: Sure thing. If you have general questions about Wikipedia, feel free to post a query on my talk page, or use the Help Desk where you'll probably get a quicker answer. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:20, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
- This is helpful and makes sense...thank you for taking the time to explain, @Cyphoidbomb:. And understood RE your interest [or lack thereof] in this particular topic. Stussll (talk) 05:50, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Stussll: This is a fairly old discussion, so I'd be surprised if any of the editors above responded. As a general guideline in lists, subjects should probably have articles that establish their notability before we add them. Note List of current child actors from the United States, where most of the additions have blue links? This means that most of those people have articles written about them, and notability in most cases is properly established. (See our General Notability Guideline and WP:NOTABILITY) Having all those articles exist first helps to discourage vanity additions, like grandmothers adding their beloved grandchildren to lists. Same here. I am not interested in the subject of Vine, so I wouldn't be able to contribute, but I can offer general guidance as someone who has been around Wikipedia for a long time. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:48, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
- This sounds like a great idea. @Greshthegreat:, @Yoloanonymous298: did either one of you want to start this section? If not, I'm happy to get it going. @Cyphoidbomb:, good call – did you have any ideas in mind for what qualifies "notability" in this context? FWIW, I'm new to the talk pages, so if I'm behaving in a way that's counter to common etiquette, please let me know ^ _ ^ Stussll (talk) 00:10, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
Could we add and say when vine went out of service?
I'm new to the talk section of Wikipedia so please forgive me if I write in the wrong format or something or forget to type something. On the Vine (service) article, I noticed a minor detail. Where it says (in the Quick Facts section) when the service was active till, it says January 17, 2017 and says that's 11 months ago. But I think that should be updated, for relativity, to "1 year ago". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel Klimovich (talk • contribs) 14:41, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Although there is talk about the discontinuation of the vine platform there is no mention of vine 2. Vine 2 is the sequel to vine that is created by the same creators as the original I think it would add value to the article to include information about the vine 2 platform. There are reliable sources that speak about the new social media platform.Mackboonkr (talk) 01:27, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Memes
I think we need coverage in the article of the memes which have spawned from, or were popularized by, this service. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 23:10, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
V2
I feel like V2 should get it's own page while it's not well known, so when it's known or when it's released we won't have one page become convoluted with information for both. Not high priority but should be mentioned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MalachiGS (talk • contribs) 18:48, April 25, 2018 (UTC)
v2 is just the placeholder name for the upcoming application. When the application comes out, the entry on this page will be updated and if the new application meets the notability guidelines, it will have its own separate article. Handoto 00:29, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
Spelling error
In 3rd paragraph of “Discontinuation of Vine Service,” in the sentence “Vine's top 9,725 accounts had seized to upload more vines,“ the word “seized” should be “ceased”. Kulesza.j (talk) 12:34, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
- Fixed! Thanks for pointing that out - PrussianOwl (talk) 17:18, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
Colin Kroll listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Colin Kroll. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. 67.70.34.69 (talk) 21:59, 16 December 2018 (UTC)