This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
In Neal Gabler's Disney book, the budget is claimed to be "almost 0.8 million dollars". Could be worht to include. 84.210.60.115 (talk) 15:13, 2 February 2011 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The opening paragraph ends with "De Seversky appeared in the film, an unusual departure from the Disney animated feature films of the time.[1]" Ummm, something like 25% of 1941's Fantasia is just some guy talking about the music and animation. Lisiate (talk) 22:32, 19 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
IP 67.188.1.213 has repeatedly edit warred this violation of WP:COPYVIOEL and WP:YOUTUBE into the article. The film has a clear copyright notice within the first minute or two. Sundayclose (talk) 01:41, 10 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
This is true, but the copyright on this film expired at the end of 1971 when it was not renewed during that year, 28 years after the original registration. The rule is explained here [1]. The records of all 1971 copyright renewals are visible here [2]. This source is considered authoritative by the US Copyright and Trademark Office per the reference on page 2 of this circular [3] I will now restore my edit. 67.188.1.213 (talk) 03:48, 14 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
