Article tone

edit

The article's tone is not right, in that the woman's claims are not widely recognised - the claims may have been reported at different times by the fringe in Russia, and occasionally by "western" media at times that Russia is under pressure (i.e. 2008 war) - but the claims should not be presented as fact in the article, claims need to be presented as exactly that - claims, otherwise it presents WP:BLP issues as well.

Additionally, the photo, which is free as per Kremlin licence, is more than relevant to the article, as the woman is only (non) notable for the single claim of someone being her son, and the photo is presented to let the reader decide if her claims are true, or whether they are bunk (which is most likely). --Russavia Let's dialogue 21:14, 27 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

The above user has been banned indefinitely from Wikipedia.

Documentaire: La maman de Vladimir Poutine

edit

There is a Dutch documentary of 2003 on her https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xM9nSDXd_50?t=2725Jerome Potts (talk) 13:58, 4 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Video unavailable
This video is no longer available because the YouTube account associated with this video has been terminated.

But is available in https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x7msyek Also and this video Putin's Mama director Ineke Smits 2003 with English Subtitle https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnIgOHF9zTI VaioSun (talk) 23:14, 2 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

In this Russian name, the surname is Nikolaevna.

edit

No, in this Russian name, Nikolaevna is the paternal name (daughter of Nikolay), and Putina is the surname. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.15.48.24 (talk) 18:10, 28 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

I fixed the hatnote, param was set wrong by IP last month. Mellk (talk) 23:01, 28 June 2022 (UTC)Reply