Talk:Varied thrush

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

Untitled edit

The picture doesn't seem that great for identification purposes...plus i kinda don't like the aesthetic of having a pic of a wild bird perched on someone's hand. Any thoughts? - Doviende

Sources edit

Editio princeps (talk) 20:39, 13 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

ADW is a good initial place to look, but it is better not to use that nor EoL in the long term as both are tertiary sources (like WP). I have JSTOR access too if you find articles there. Casliber (talk · contribs) 02:48, 14 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
I've downloaded a full version of the Birds of North America issue 541 - plenty of useful information, so I'll be citing it for a while, though once I've invested every possible bit of information from it I'll check out some of the other sources above. Editio princeps (talk) 14:56, 14 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
That sounds like a good idea. A comprehensive overview is good for getting the structure right before proceeding with more specialised sources. Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:15, 14 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Varied thrush. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:46, 19 March 2016 (UTC)Reply