Talk:Varaha Upanishad/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 13:30, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Will review. Sainsf <^>_{Talk all words} 13:30, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Lead

• and Ultimate Reality "the" Ultimate Reality

• Done

• Can you add a line about what an Upanishad is?

• Done. Added to main with source, and shorter one to lead.

• "Ribhu" need not be in italics

• Done by @Nvvchar

Etymology and anthology

• the incarnation of Vishnu as boar of "Hindu god" Vishnu, as "a" boar

• Done

• it was created between the 13th and 16th centuries Specify the time of its creation in the lead too.

• Done

• Link Vedic literature

• Done

• Reword: Varaha Upanishad was listed neither in the anthology of ... Shikoh, nor in the early 19th-century Henry Thomas Colebrooke anthology or the Narayana compilations of Upanishads.

• Done

Chronology

• The text is one of the Yoga Upanishads This repeats what was mentioned in the last section

• Removed second instance

• other Yoga Upanishads, it was composed Semicolon instead of comma.

• Done

• Who is Antonio Rigopoulos? Historian?

• Added he is a professor in Italy

• possibly in the middle of 2nd millennium CE Did you mean BCE?

• No. This is a late Upanishad. The earliest Yoga Upanishads are dated to ~4th/2nd-century BCE, the last ones ~15th century CE.

Contents

• Very well-written.

• Well done @Nvvchar !!

• Only the duplinks are the problem: Agni (Tattvas), Brahman (Brahmavidya), karma (Sankalpa), Yoga (Samadhi), Upanishad (Axiology)

• Removed

• There is problem in ref. no. 46.

• Fixed

Nice article. Those were my comments. Sainsf <^>_{Talk all words} 13:30, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

@Sainsf: Thanks for the review. I will shortly check the sources and address these points. @Nvvchar: give me 24 hours, please double check / add. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 14:55, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

@Nvvchar: Anything I missed? Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 16:45, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

• Thanks for replying to the review comments. I am sure @Sainsf: will find them in order. Nvvchar. 17:00, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Thank you both! This article is a GA now.--Sainsf <^>_{Talk all words} 18:15, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

• Thanks, Sainsf. As the AutoBot does not leave any message on my nomination both at the start of the GA review and after approval, can you please leave a message of this GA approval on our talk pages?--Nvvchar. 01:10, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Sorry I have no idea how to do that. There may be some script that is blocking the bot, or is it something else? I think it is Legobot who is involved with GANs. Sainsf <^>_{Talk all words} 02:02, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

• SainsfYou could use the same format as it is posted on your approved GAs by only changing the name and date of approval of the article and then signing it.Nvvchar. 03:14, 4 February 2016 (UTC)