Talk:Valence (psychology)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Zigzig20s in topic Lacanian valence
WikiProject iconCognitive science Stub‑class (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Cognitive science, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Hedonic Tone edit

There really needs to be an article on Hedonic tone. It fits in with Behavioral Economics. And the Daniel Kahneman article needs expanding. DCDuring 22:37, 9 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Overlap edit

This article seems to overlap pretty heavily with the Valence effect article. I think it makes sense to merge them, but don't know the Wikipedia process for making that a "formal" suggestion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Emergentchaos (talkcontribs) 23:44, 1 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Page name not great edit

The lack of the word "emotion" in the page title is not helpful for people who don't already know what this is about. "Valence" is a terribly abstract word that could apply to just about anything.

Are either of these better?

  • emotional valence (psychology)
  • valence (psychology of emotion)

Unfortunately, this is not obvious. — MaxEnt 23:58, 27 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Lacanian valence edit

We should add a few lines about Lacanian valence informed by jouissance. If anyone is able to find reliable sources about this, please ping me.Zigzig20s (talk) 21:20, 15 October 2016 (UTC)Reply