Talk:Vaghela dynasty

Latest comment: 3 years ago by 42.106.196.88 in topic Dispute
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Result is Merge.

Merger proposal

edit

I propose to merge Vaghela into Vaghela dynasty as they seem to be of the same subject. In fact, they were both copy pasted by User:Sachaai in 13 July 2009. --Muhandes (talk) 22:07, 5 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Vaghela are sub caste of Nai?

edit

If Vaghela are not sub caste or surname of Nai caste so why Nai caste article state that vaghela is division of nai caste? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kharari (talkcontribs) 01:42, 27 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Dispute

edit

Please see WP:SYNTH first user:Chariotrider555 you took the source where they are described as rajputs later you used the source of Cynthia where she mentions rajput Identity didn't exist in 12th cent it didn't mentions vaghela trying to connect them is purely WP:UNDUE WP:OR and violation of WP:SYNTH42.106.196.88 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 14:38, 20 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

If neither Jackson nor Talbot mentions that Vaghelas specifically as Rajputs in later times, then there is no reason for the entire statement to even be there. Chariotrider555 (talk) 15:50, 20 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Fine.42.106.196.88 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 16:02, 20 April 2021 (UTC)Reply