Talk:Vagal maneuver

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 October 2021 and 20 November 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Bkp0061. Peer reviewers: Aparnasankar.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:37, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Untitled

I am unconvinced this is truly a disambiguation page. The links on the page are not examples of different uses of the term 'vagal maneouvre'; they are examples OF vagal maneuvres. Vagal maneuvres has a definition of its own which applies to all of the examples.

WikiMed Course Peer Review:

General info Whose work are you reviewing? Bkp0061

Link to draft you're reviewing https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vagal_maneuver&oldid=1054768487

Link to the current version of the article (if it exists) Vagal maneuver

Evaluate the drafted changes

Lead

The lead of this article provides a clear and succinct description of the article's topic. A sentence or two about the divisions of the autonomic nervous system and the vagus nerve being a part of the parasympathetics could work in the intro. The line about over-stimulation of the vagus nerve causing fainting could also go in the physiology section.

Content Besides the lead section, this article was almost entirely empty at the beginning of this course, so a significant amount if information has been added. The information is up to date, relevant to the article, andis medically relevant.

Tone and Balance This article is unbiased and does not attempt to persuade the reader in favor of any position.

Sources and References The sources support the information provided in the article and the few links that I checked were valid and up to date. All of the content is backed by references.

Organization The content of the article is cohesive, well-written, and seems understandable to those who may not have a medical background. The content is well organized. There are no grammatical errors.

Images and Media There is one image in this article. I don't think the article needs any more visual aids.

Overall impressions: The additions made to this page are great. I think the lead could be a little longer but otherwise the content, especially the physiology section, is strong. There is one line in the physiology section that says citation needed. Also, I think the number of links to other wiki articles makes this page more discoverable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aparnasankar (talk • contribs) 18:35, 17 November 2021 (UTC)