Talk:V (Spock's Beard album)

Fair use rationale for Image:SpocksBeardValbumcover.jpg

Image:SpocksBeardValbumcover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:32, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:V (Spock's Beard album)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

* Y All the C class criteria * Y A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details * N full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians * N No obvious issues with sourcing, including the use of blatantly improper sources. * N No significant issues exist to hamper readability, although it may not rigorously follow WP:MOS This article lacks technical personnel, and there's no citations at all! So it's going down to a c-rating. Andrzejbanas (talk) 00:32, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Last edited at 18:20, 8 September 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 09:45, 30 April 2016 (UTC)