Talk:University of Bremen
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Name
editThe article is confused about the name of the university. There is no such thing as the "University of Bremen". It's "Universität Bremen".
On the university internet homepage the English language pages also say "University of Bremen". So this is an official translation. 77.183.72.38 13:59, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- correct, the english language pages say "university of bremen". take a look: http://www.portrait.uni-bremen.de/index_en.html --Freiwilliger 11:41, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
Someone speaking English should review this article. There are some errors and colloquial expressions. An Academics section would be desirable.
Fair use rationale for Image:Unibremen2.gif
edit
Image:Unibremen2.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 15:46, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Palmen in der Arktis Nature Geosience
edit- Ist es nicht wahrscheinlicher, aus Sicht der Deutschen Astronomie, dass sich die Erde bei ihrer Bahn in einem Jahr um die Sonne, so gedreht hat, dass das, was heute bei der Erdkugel die Arktis ist, damals in Richtung zum heutigen Aeqautorbreitengrad Null Grad gedreht hat. Diese Astronomische Sicht des Sonnensystems und der Erde erklaert auch die Erdoelvorkommen, Erdgasvorkommen, Kohlevorkommen (Ursprung Biosphaere Carbonzeitalter). Niemand weiss die chemikalische Begruendung und die physikalische Begruendung dafuer, dass sich die Erde in 365/366 (Schaltjahr) um die Sonne dreht. Geschweige hat die Chemische Technik oder Technische Chemie fuer den Gewaltigen Antrieb der Erde eine Nachbaubare Nachkonstruierbare Erklaerung. In einem Jahr (366 Sonnenaufgaenge) bewegt eine unerklaerliche Kraft unerklaerische chemische Reaktion die Erde in 8760/8784 Stunden (http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erdbahn) um die Sonne. Geschweige hat die Chemische Technik oder Technische Chemie fuer den Gewaltigen Antrieb der Erde ("940 Mio. km" pro Jahr http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erdbahn#Sonnenbahn) eine Nachbaubare Nachkonstruierbare Erklaerung. 82.109.84.114 (talk) 11:16, 26 October 2009 (UTC)