Talk:Unity of the proposition

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophy of language

Linguistics: Philosophy of language Mid‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Philosophy of language task force.

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It might be a good idea to add these references:

Gibson, M. (2004), From Naming To Saying. The Unity Of The Proposition (Blackwell).

Davidson, D. (2005), Truth And Predication (MIT Press).

Rosa Lichtenstein (talk) 11:24, 9 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Quotation section edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I removed the toplevel heading 'Quotation' which contained an (unsourced for >1year) quote supposedly from Davidson; I looked at the sechead in the TOC and thought it would be about the linguistic device of quotation. If the quote is sourced and returned to the article we need to find a different way to present it I think. BrideOfKripkenstein (talk) 16:34, 25 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

The quotation: "... as far as I can see, it's a problem that remains unsolved in the minds of most philosophers working in the semantics of natural language." is from Donald Davidson Interviewed. Ontoraul (talk) 21:33, 31 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic