Talk:United States v. O'Hara
Latest comment: 4 years ago by SamWinchester000 in topic Extremely outdated article?
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Excessive detail edit
I think this is excessive detail, especially the whole of section 1.5.1. The details of the indictment, including the specific contents of computer used, and most particularly, of each program segment, are a matter of primary record and need not be elaborated here DGG ( talk ) 22:05, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
- I can see that. Section 1.5.1 probably won't be relevant to the subject unless particular files are notable to the defense of O'Hara or Perez, so I will remove it. I think that some of the other detail is good to keep, though, because it explains the circumstances and the background behind the charges. But, feel free to trim and edit as you see fit. « D. Trebbien (talk) 22:18, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
Extremely outdated article? edit
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/12/09/heres-what-became-of-bernie-madoffs-inner-circle.html --SamWinchester000 (talk) 09:00, 14 September 2019 (UTC)