Talk:United States v. Apple (2012)

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Apple Inc. Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Apple Inc.Wikipedia:WikiProject Apple Inc.Template:WikiProject Apple Inc.Apple Inc. articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article is currently the subject of an educational assignment. Further details are available here.

First review. Wh-237 (talk) 22:30, 29 October 2013 (UTC) edit

all quotes have citations
lead section concisely summarized article
non-quoted text is sparing with jargon
wikilinks: maybe link to Sherman Act in lead
(skipping check for orphan status before move)
neutrality looks fine, looks verifiable
source links work fine
not sure if contribution is clear; it's all quotes at this point
non-quoted text has correct grammar and stuff
(skipping check for categorization before move)
PROBLEM: UNCLEAR ON IMPORTANCE OF TOPIC
hm, all references are opinion text
PROBLEM: CITATIONS ARE JUST URLS
infobox present. Maybe consider switching to Infobox United States District Court case
(skipping check for talk template before move)

Has this article moved? I'm holding off on DYK nomination.