Talk:Unionist Party (Punjab)
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Andrew Gwilliam in topic Neutrality
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Unionist Party (Punjab) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Untitled edit
This article is totally and completely inaccurate.
1-The party's name was Unionist Party. It was an alliance of Muslim feudals and Hindu industrialists.
2- It seconded Muslim League's Lahore resolution.
3- All India Muslim League of Jinnah's did not ask for the partitioning of Punjab and Bengal.
4- Khizer Hayat Tiwana was NOT the son of Sikandar Hayat. Sikandar Hayat's son Shaukat Hayat was with Jinnah. -- unsigned comment by 203.81.196.194 13:06, 16 March 2006
- Plase put your "CORECTIONS:" section on this talk page, not on article itself... AnonMoos 13:20, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
Neutrality edit
"were the twin founders of this great party." for instance, lots of other pov stuff I can see just scanning the page aswell. AlexTG (talk) 00:32, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
- I've done my best to strip out all explicitly POV stuff from the article, as well as making a few other changes. Hopefully it's now a reasonable article for an expert to expand upon. Andrew Gwilliam (talk) 10:58, 3 August 2011 (UTC).