 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled edit
I think we've fixed the "inappropriate tone" thing. I'm removing the tag. RobHutten (talk) 18:59, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Repetition edit
I noticed that the text referencing the area's unemployment rate is duplicated in the article, each with its own citation number. Plus, the stated claim is difficult to verify from the cited reference, which is a web page containing a map that does not appear to specifically define the boundaries of the community discussed. Finally, when using the map feature to map the variable "Unemployment rate", the colour of the map's "aggregation areas" over a significant portion of the discussed community is shown as "Not Available" (i.e. dark blue). Therefore, in all fairness, unless there is a more authoritative reference, the unemployment rate statements in this article should be removed altogether. A. Macdonald. 24.222.87.186 (talk) 16:19, 5 April 2019 (UTC)