Talk:Umm ar-Rihan
 | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
 | A fact from Umm ar-Rihan appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 September 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Umm ar-Rihan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101210000000/http://www.pcbs.gov.ps/Portals/_PCBS/Downloads/book1487.pdf to http://www.pcbs.gov.ps/Portals/_PCBS/Downloads/book1487.pdf
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://domino.un.org/UNISPAL.NSF/e9abb7dfb6e319c90525675900535dba/d2f86a14289df2a085256ea1006e5f3a%21OpenDocument
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:03, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Concern for biased articles as a basis for new edits edit
As this topic has just become media popular, thanks to an article posted on social media, its worth touching on the matter of biased articles used as a pretext to insert biased text into this article.
The article in question is found at https://www.ynetnews.com/article/b164zldap . ynetnews is an Israeli media outlet that claims to have no overt political agenda. However Im concerned that the article uses inflammatory rhetoric, and has clear pro-Israel bias that I feel makes it unfit for sourcing a completely new section that attempts to establish a Jewish connection to the place after widespread article proliferation, which could be used in an attempt to establish authenticity of such claims in a feedback loop.
In the new section titled "Pre-British Mandate era", there is novel rhetoric referencing Jewish periods and introducing new information sourced solely from the article in question, where the rest of the article references Roman periods and ruins.
I think that an un-biased corroborating source should be found if this passage is to remain in this article. Vrrtigo (talk) 20:10, 20 March 2024 (UTC)