Talk:Uch

Strange statement

"Formerly located at the confluence of the Indus and Chenab rivers, it is now removed to Mithankot, some 100 km from that confluence."

The meaning of this sentence is obscure. Has the location of the city actually moved 100 km ? Or is the city in the same place, but the location where the rivers join has moved ? The second meaning seems more likely, in which case the sentence should be changed.Eregli bob (talk) 11:08, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

I hadn't seen the above when I noticed the same thing, and changed the page accordingly. I just assumed that cities don't move, but confluences in flat land do. Maproom (talk) 15:30, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Uch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060210170154/http://archnet.org/library/sites/one-site.tcl?site_id=56 to http://archnet.org/library/sites/one-site.tcl?site_id=56

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:31, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Original research and out of scope

The ancient section of this page included a lot of original research. The text has been copied and pasted between different cities (the citation given shows a search term for Chitral). It is not properly cited, and has many claims which are not even in the source. And beside, the information given is not even important to Uch - it may be better off on a page about the history of punjab if it can be properly sourced. but this page doesnt need a lengthy discussion about changragupta's treaty with selceus etc etc Alishernavoi (talk) 07:16, 3 September 2020 (UTC)